Bishops’ decrees on SSPX may be illegal, says traditionalist group

Mass is celebrated at the SSPX headquarters in Switzerland (CNS)

Mass is celebrated at the SSPX headquarters in Switzerland (CNS)

Bishops who effectively excommunicate those who attend SSPX Masses may be acting illegally, a leading traditionalist group has said.

The International Una Voce Federation was responding to statements by bishops in Italy and Argentina.

The Federation challenged a decree by the Diocese of Albano, “claiming to excommunicate those who receive the sacraments from, or attend religious services of, the Society of St Pius X”.

The Federation also questioned the legality of a similar statement by Bishop Óscar Sarlinga of Zárate-Campana in Argentina.

“The Federation believes that these ‘notifications’ tend to imply that anyone who has ever attended services of the SSPX is not welcome in parish churches in these dioceses,” a statement said.

“This view is clearly in direct contrast with the emphasis of the Supreme Pontiff, Pope Francis, upon mercy and forgiveness, as well as the ‘openness of heart’ requested by Pope Benedict XVI as a prelude to a healing of divisions ‘in the heart of the Church’.”

The statement continued: “The Federation is asking the Holy See to advise that these notifications are defective and to require them to be modified so as to comply with the law of the Church and the decisions of the Holy See.”

The Bishop of Albano, the Rt Rev Marcello Semeraro, is the Italian bishops’ conference spokesman and secretary of the Council of Cardinal Advisers, which advises Pope Francis on Church governance.

The International Una Voce Federation represents lay organisations around the world promoting the Extraordinary Form. It was founded in 1964 in Paris and counted the composers Maurice Duruflé and Olivier Messiaen among its early members.


About The Voice Of Bombay's Catholic Laity

Bombay Laity Ezekiel’s Chapter 3 Task as Watchman 17 “Son of man, I have made you a watchman for the people of Israel; so hear the word I speak and give them warning from me. 18 When I say to a wicked person, ‘You will surely die,’ and you do not warn them or speak out to dissuade them from their evil ways in order to save their life, that wicked person will die for[b] their sin, and I will hold you accountable for their blood. 19 But if you do warn the wicked person and they do not turn from their wickedness or from their evil ways, they will die for their sin; but you will have saved yourself.
This entry was posted in Church Worldwide news. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Bishops’ decrees on SSPX may be illegal, says traditionalist group

  1. John Menezes says:

    Catholics who are well-read and well-informed on the Vatican II documents are aware that when Paul VI signed the Dogmatic Constitution of the Church, or Lumen Gentium, on 24/11/1964, he instituted a New Church and a New Religion and, in order to meet the tenets of this New Church, he revised all the sacramental rites which range from dubious (Baptism) to invalid (Eucharist, Ordination and Annointing). Therefore, many in Mumbai have recourse to the SSPX priest at approaching death for vaild Confession, valid Extreme Unction, the Exsequial Mass and burial. SSPXers world over, after Vatican II, have continued to follow the Ten Commandments and to frequent the confessional regularly and, consequently, they are in no need of Francis-mercy because bigamy and sodomy are not to be found in their ranks.
    John Menezes

  2. Jeremy says:


    I think you will find interesting consulting some of the below links. They come for a Traditional Catholic website you might know (a Benedictine Monastery) :

    The Truth About The SSPX, The SSPX-MC, And Similar Groups:
    Blind To Benedict XVI – Fraternity Of St. Peter:
    The SSPV:
    Sedevacantist priests who deny Catholic salvation dogma !:
    False Traditionalism & The Church In The End Times:
    Natural Family Planning: A Birth Control Deception:
    The Best Argument Against “Baptism of Desire”:
    The Latin Text of the Oldest Surviving Papal Decree Rejects “Baptism of Desire”:
    How Can ‘Baptism of Desire’ Be Contrary to Dogma?:
    Accepting Francis = Apostasy:
    The Third Secret of Fatima (3rd edition) – An Overview of the Entire Vatican II Apostasy:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s