Catholic priest will remain part of clergy despite arrival of his child

Father Daniel McFallsFather Daniel McFalls, who quit his post at St. Mary’s Catholic Church in Stockton, CA, has announced that his son Gabriel has arrived.

Last week Father McFalls, known as Dean, told his congregation “A child will soon be born, and I am the baby’s father”.
With these words McFalls voluntarily quit his post recently, admitting he had gotten a woman pregnant and leaving his congregants reeling.
But at least one member of his congregations professed herself glad, calling him ‘flirty.’
Diana Garcia, who has attended the church for 15 years, told Fox News: ‘He’s gone after girls before and he’s gone after my daughters.’
‘He’s just lustful, he didn’t say he was in love or would marry the girl, no. It’s not about being a sinner, it’s about playing with God, he made a vow, this is a priest we’re talking about.’
In a letter sent to the church and read to his congregation, McFalls said: ‘I know this comes as a shock to you, and to many a disappointment.
‘I assume full responsibility for my actions and will do all that I can so that my child receives the care and love that he deserves.
‘As St. Paul told the Romans: ‘God makes all things work together for the good of those who love him, who have been called according to his decree,’ and though the Lord never decreed that I sin, he does command that all life be respected and nurtured.’
According to the Daily Mail McFalls’ was given an indefinite leave of absence by Bishop Stephen E. Blaire, head of the Diocese of Stockton, and will now have to decide if he wants to remain a priest.
Now the St. Mary of The Assumption Parish will have to find a new priest after McFalls’ sudden resignation.
Priests make their vows for life, so McFalls could serve other communities and continue to perform his priestly duties, such as marrying people, unless he volunteers to ‘laicise’ himself.
Laicisation is the official process carried out by The Holy See in Rome to effectively ‘unmake’ a Catholic priest.
Many congregants are unaware that priests do not have to laicise themselves following sexual relations, even if a child is born.

The Church is free to deal with them in the same way they deal with adulterous husbands who may wish to continue being married.
The process of ‘laicisation’ is uncommon, but it has increased significantly in recent times following the Catholic Church’s international child abuse scandal.



About The Voice Of Bombay's Catholic Laity

Bombay Laity Ezekiel’s Chapter 3 Task as Watchman 17 “Son of man, I have made you a watchman for the people of Israel; so hear the word I speak and give them warning from me. 18 When I say to a wicked person, ‘You will surely die,’ and you do not warn them or speak out to dissuade them from their evil ways in order to save their life, that wicked person will die for[b] their sin, and I will hold you accountable for their blood. 19 But if you do warn the wicked person and they do not turn from their wickedness or from their evil ways, they will die for their sin; but you will have saved yourself.
This entry was posted in Church Worldwide news. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Catholic priest will remain part of clergy despite arrival of his child

  1. Very very shocking. I cannot digest this.

  2. Honestly this laicisation is something new I am hearing of from this article. Perhaps what I was taught when I was a kid was that once ordained a priest, not even God could take that power of consecration away from the priest, was totally wrong.
    This “unmaking” story seems very weird. Yes I was also taught that for a priest that erred or strayed, the Church authorities could prohibit him from performing his priestly duties; but if the priest in the context of Holy Mass decided to pronounce the Holy words of Consecration like it or not JESUS just HAD to come down physically to the altar at the priest’s command. THIS WAS THE POWER GIVEN TO THE PRIEST AT HIS ORDINATION.
    Another power given to the priest at his ordination was the power to forgive sins, and that in an emergency, even a defrocked priest could offer absolution.
    So is this “unmaking” correct, ??? and all that we were taught in the days gone by total rubbish ?????
    Will some knowledgeable person/priest please clarify/ answer me

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s