Can a 53-yr-old HC order solve church property scams?

  • 14 Jun 2013
  • Hindustan Times (Mumbai)
  • Manoj R Nair, Associate Editor

Can a 53-yr-old HC order solve church property scams?

Taken from Hindustan Times Page 6 Mumbai edition dated 14th June 2013

Last month, the office of the charity commissioner ordered one of its senior officials to inquire into complaints by a community group that Roman Catholic churches in Mumbai were not implementing a 1960 order of Bombay High Judgment which said that church properties should be managed like ‘public trusts’.

Groups like the Association of Concerned Catholics (AOCC) have been opposing the current system of estate administration at churches where the parish priest, as the ‘sole trustee’, enjoys unlimited powers in the management of church property.

Though property disputes in the Roman Catholic Church is not on the scale of the scam that has hit Protestant churches in Mumbai, there have allegations that priests have entered into illegal deals to sell church land. At least two churches — St Michael’s in Mahim and Our Lady of Egypt in Kalina — have figured in these allegations. In case of the Kalina church, a former parish priest was among three people named in an FIR about illegal sale of church property.

Community groups say that priests have unbridled powers. They have suggested that a larger group of trustees, including members of the community, elected under provisions of the Bombay Public Trust Act, could be a deterrent against such scams.

Arcanjo Sodder, an advocate and member of AOCC asks, “Priests are being allowed to function as sole trustees. Why do they not have community representatives in the trust?”

The 1960 judgment that these groups are talking about was given by the Bombay High Court in response to an appeal filed by the vicar of Sacred Heart Church, Worli, who opposed his church’s definition as a public trust under the Bombay Public Trusts Act.

The priest argued that they were governed by the Canon Law, their personal law, for appointment of religious officials and also for administration of church properties. So, the priest concluded, there was no need to register those churches as public trusts.

The priest’s arguments were first rejected by the Charity Commissioner and later by the City Civil Court, after which he had filed an appeal in the High Court. It was also pointed out that, while the act specifically mentioned a temple, Math and Wakf (Muslim religious property) as public trusts, the term ‘church’ was not included. Also, other characteristics of a trust — an author, beneficiary and an instrument or document of trust — was absent in case of church properties, it was claimed.

The judge relied on judgments from Madhya Pradesh, Wales and even the Magna Carta — the AD 1215 charter on political and civil rights drawn up in England — to say that a parish church was also a public trust. While the court agreed that the Canon Law was not an instrument of trust, it said that the churches are public religious trusts because an instrument of trust is not always required for the existence of a trust. The court said that the Canon Law is not the law of the land.

Another argument by the priest that the Bombay Public Trusts Act offends religious freedom was rejected by the court which said that the Constitution, while recognising religious groups’ rights to administer their property, says that administration of its property must be in accordance with the law of the land, in this case the Public Trusts Act.

It is not clear whether the Worli church appealed against the HC order, but community members say the judgment has been ignored by churches. The spokesperson for the Archdiocese of Bombay was not available for comment.

“If the churches are not implementing this order, what laity participation do you expect?” asks Sodder.

Post your comments…

Please Sign in to post your comment.

About The Voice Of Bombay's Catholic Laity

Bombay Laity Ezekiel’s Chapter 3 Task as Watchman 17 “Son of man, I have made you a watchman for the people of Israel; so hear the word I speak and give them warning from me. 18 When I say to a wicked person, ‘You will surely die,’ and you do not warn them or speak out to dissuade them from their evil ways in order to save their life, that wicked person will die for[b] their sin, and I will hold you accountable for their blood. 19 But if you do warn the wicked person and they do not turn from their wickedness or from their evil ways, they will die for their sin; but you will have saved yourself.
This entry was posted in Church News in Mumbai/Thane/Navi Mumbai. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Can a 53-yr-old HC order solve church property scams?

  1. M Dsouza says:

    Nothing happens,people licking Ossie’s feet get Night of Shining Armour Medals!

  2. Dont loose hope,he will not be there for too long. The issue is being taken up with the local govt,When they dont wish to listen we need to expose them once and for all come what may.

  3. Jack Robison says:

    If I understand your comments and who the solicitor of the church is, yes, he is absolutely corrupt and instigates many families into litigation. Many catholics are given wrong legal advice by this guy .

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s